Thanks for taking the time to look at it.  I'll try taking a look at the
code myself sometime maybe ;)  Until then hopefully my users will be able to
deal with the numbers starting from zero :-D.

Thanks again,
Thad  


On 1/31/07 3:05 PM, "Geert Bevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> A bit like http://blablalist.com? :-p
> 
> 
> Anyway, this needs work on the OrdinalManager and quite some
> additional tests to be written. Honestly, I don't think it's very
> important and as you say, just a presentation issue. I have to admit
> that I would not rank it high on the todo list, sorry. Of course,
> you're free to modify OrdinalManage, add the capability to configure
> this and contribute the patch back ;-)
> 
> Take care,
> 
> Geert
> 
> On 31 Jan 2007, at 20:59, Thad Cox wrote:
> 
>> Geert,
>> 
>> I essentially have task lists that I allow users to add from and
>> remove from
>> at will.  Inside each task list I have as you would expect a set of
>> ordered
>> tasks. The user can modify (move, add, remove) tasks and I need to
>> keep the
>> task number properly displayed (when the tasks are run this number
>> is used
>> to tell the user which task failed).
>> 
>> I think the user would be less confused if the task number started
>> from 1
>> and not 0.  I realize I could just display the task number + 1 to
>> the user
>> but I would prefer to keep the numbers consistent between the front
>> and back
>> ends.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Thad
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/31/07 2:06 PM, "Geert Bevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Thad,
>>> 
>>> it's not possible to start with 1 with the current implementation of
>>> the OrdinalManager, I don't understand why this is a problem though.
>>> Can you explain why you would need that?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Geert
>>> 
>>> On 31 Jan 2007, at 16:57, Thad Cox wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I was hoping to have an entry number to use as an Ordinal with the
>>>> Ordinal
>>>> Manager.  I set it up and everything works ok except the ordinal
>>>> manager is
>>>> using 0 as the first value when I would like it to be set to 1.  Is
>>>> there
>>>> anyway to restrict the starting value for the ordinal manager?
>>> --
>>> Geert Bevin
>>> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
>>> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
>>> Music and words - http://gbevin.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rife-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message
>> may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.
>>  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please
>> be advised that any distribution, dissemination, copying or other
>> transmission or use of the information contained in this message
>> or its enclosed attachments is strictly prohibited.  Please
>> notify us immediately if you have received this message in error
>> by replying to the sender of the message and deleting it from
>> your computer.  Thank you.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rife-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
>> 
> 
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
> Music and words - http://gbevin.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rife-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users


-----
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message
may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.
 If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please
be advised that any distribution, dissemination, copying or other
transmission or use of the information contained in this message
or its enclosed attachments is strictly prohibited.  Please
notify us immediately if you have received this message in error
by replying to the sender of the message and deleting it from
your computer.  Thank you. 
 

_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users

Reply via email to