Dear All, Thank you for this suggestion, we put this feature on our agenda as a requested item. We'll do some internal check on what it would take to implement this, and report back to you about ETAs.
Regards, Robert On 2015-12-23 0:10, Marco Slater wrote: > Agreed! +1 > > -Marco > >> On 22 Dec 2015, at 23:51, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> yes. YES! >> >> Nick >> >> Daniel Suchy wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>>> On 22.12.2015 22:31, Rickard Östman wrote: >>>> awesome idea. >>>> >>>> another useful feature would be to let the probe share via the atlas >>>> portal what device and port it's connected to. To the owner alone, that is. >>>> >>>> /Rickard >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Max Gebert <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey! >>>> >>>> I could definitely see the appeal of such a function in our network. >>>> +1 from me! >>>> >>>> Best regards/ Hälsningar >>>> Max Gebert >>>> >>>>> 22 dec 2015 kl. 18:23 skrev Chris Elliott <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Annika Wickert >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to see LLDP support in the future on the RIPE probes. >>>>> >>>>> It would be a really helpful feature, to see on what Port the >>>>> RIPE Probe resides at the moment. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Annika >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Chris Elliott >>>>> CCIE # 2013 >>>>> >>>>> “You and I are mirages that perceive themselves” >>>>> --Douglas Hofstadter >> >> > >
