Hello,

I would like to suggest a naming convention for probes that excludes
names referring to features or networks which are not present/supported.

For example, I see a probe that contains in its name a large network,
although the probe is actually connected to competitor networks. (I
assume the probe's host changed their ISP and forgot to update the
probe's name.)

Such naming is misleading for Atlas users, but also opens a can of worms
in relation to trade mark law.

Similarly, a prove with "IPv6" in its name that doesn't support IPv6
could be confusing.

BR
Daniel AJ

Reply via email to