+1 - what Bengt says.
Best,
-C.
On 16.02.2021 17:40, Bengt Gördén wrote:
On 2021-02-16 15:55, Avamander wrote:
some may find it controversial, but I don't think any effort should be
spent at extending the life of IPv4. In this case, by extending the
address space.
I don't agree. This is a measurement tool. Whatever people think about
extending or not extending the lifetime of ipv4 is irrelevant. It
shouldn't hinder measurements of said networks. If there's networks out
there that pass 0/8 and 240/4 it's VERY relevant to measure it. Just
because you can't see it it doesn't mean it's not there.
--
/bengan
