Inside-AS DNS
Outside-AS DNS
RFC1918 DNS
We probably need a "localhost DNS" too
I would still argue that the "big" public resolvers warrant their own tags.
Apart from that, should there be separate tags for RFC1918
and ULA?
Paraphrasing a quote from may decades ago: "probe DNS tagging is like
math - a simple idea but it can get complicated" :-)
We could separate IPv4 and IPv6 tags in this context. Which is clearer
but also more complicated to process. Still, for each af, probes could
get multiple of these tags.
I believe it would be informative if we assembled some statistics about
the current state, ie. how many probes would get what kind of tags if we
applied them today. Perhaps Max already has some up his sleeve?
Regards,
Robert
--
ripe-atlas mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas
