Someone has made the comments on this article from ripe labs. Any comments from the community? How can this kind of thing happen in the ripe? Prior to the ripe depletion, it is even hard for my org to apply for a /19. Now my org can only apply for a /22!
So as to keep low profile to have Lu Heng’s IPs sold. He had created another shell named Wuhan Yunwaiheng Information Technology Co., Ltd registered in Wuhan, Hubei Province of China ( its Chinese name is:武汉云外恒信息技术有限公司). And then have his IPs sold under this new shell without attracting too much attentions from the RIPE community. He has earned more than 4millions USD for selling his IPs. By the way, cos of this business structure, he can avoid heaps of taxes which should be paid to Netherland Gov and Overseas Gov. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen ( this is where Lu heng graduated) 31.201.0.0/16 2011-04-28 PA SOLD AS35916 (US） 37.222.0.0/15 PA SOLD AS16276 （ovh, France） ;AS35916 46.136.0.0/16 PA SOLD AS8312（kpn Netherland）;AS35916 5.132.0.0/16 2012-07-12 PA ( Split for sales） /17 left for future sale AS35916 5.224.0.0/15 2012-09-06 SOLD AS35916 178.236.224.0/20 PA Still available for Sale AS16276 Lu Heng still has /17 +/20 left available for Sale in RIPE and one aggregated Afrinic 154.80.0.0/12 ( Currently in Rental business). The Business structure of OutsideHeaven: The main Body of OutsideHeaven was registered in Tax heaven place ( Netherland). Then come the lower Body OutsideHeaven Hangzhou ( registered in Zhejiang Province of China) and the other lower Body Wuhan Yunwaiheng Information Technology ( registered in Hubei Province of China). Under this kind of structure, the company of Lu Heng has avoided to pay the taxes he should pay to the Chinese Government. His main Body registration info: His shell company’s registration info written in holland language. However, you can use google translate to understand. Please note this company does not pay any tax in Holland and in China. Online inzage uittreksel KvK-nummer 01133738 Deze inschrijving valt onder beheer van Kamer van Koophandel Noord-Nederland Onderneming Handelsnamen OutsideHeaven AnytimeChinese Voor Altijd Rechtsvorm Eenmanszaak Startdatum onderneming 26-06-2008 Activiteiten SBI-code: 620102 - Ontwikkelen en produceren van maatwerksoftware SBI-code: 6203 - Beheer van computerfaciliteiten Werkzame personen 0 Vestiging Vestigingsnummer 000005125421 Handelsnamen OutsideHeaven AnytimeChinese Voor Altijd Bezoekadres Esdoornlaan 656, 9741MH Groningen Telefoonnummer 0641734323 Internetadressen www.anytimechinese.com (http://www.anytimechinese.com) www.anytimechinese.net (http://www.anytimechinese.net) E-mailadres [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) Datum vestiging 26-06-2008 Activiteiten SBI-code: 620102 - Ontwikkelen en produceren van maatwerksoftware SBI-code: 6203 - Beheer van computerfaciliteiten Webdesign. Het exploiteren van een informatieve website. Het geven van informatie over China aan ondernemers. De export van online gamecards. Het beheren van computernetwerken. ICT dienstverlening. Beheren van ICT infrastructuur. Werkzame personen 0 Eigenaar Naam Lu, Heng Geboortedatum en -plaats 01-09-1988, Onbekend, China Adres Esdoornlaan 656, 9741MH Groningen Datum in functie 26-06-2008 One of His Chinese Dummy Corporation named 杭州云外恒网络技术有限公司 in Chinese／English name: outside heaven If you look at its websites, there is no update since 2013 http://www.outsideheaven.com/zh-cn/news You can search the company registration info via link http://122.224.75.235:7082/wsdjpt/ The other of his Chinese Dummy Corporation named Wuhan Yunwaiheng Information Technology Co., Ltd registered in Wuhan, Hubei Province of China ( its Chinese name is:武汉云外恒信息技术有限公司) You can search the company registration info via link http://gssoso.whhd.gov.cn/dhb/index.html Ironically, a Clever Chinese guy without “Euro blood” can be "smart Enough" to have as many RIPE IPs as he can. On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 2:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service > Region (Sebastian Wiesinger) > 2. Re: New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service > Region (remco van mook) > 3. Re: New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service > Region (Hannigan, Martin) > 4. Re: New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service > Region (Michele Neylon - Blacknight) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:54:14 +0200 > From: Sebastian Wiesinger <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > To: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in > the RIPE NCC Service Region > Message-ID: <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > * Dan L?dtke <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> [2015-05-08 11:33]: > > See, we can not win this games. Let?s stop wasting energy and > > resources on dealing with legacy IP and how to make it work for a > > bit longer. New entrants are entering are market that is not fair, > > and we can not make a real difference. The only way forward is to > > push IPv6 and restore a healthy climate regarding the availability > > of IP addresses. > > > > > Dan, > > if you don't want to invest your time trying to make this market more > fair by all means go ahead and do something else. There are still > people here who would like to try so that new players can enter a > market that will be dominated by IPv4 for some time to come. > > Most people here are pushing IPv6 but as much as you want to bury IPv4 > it will still be around for some time. > > Regards > > Sebastian > > -- > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > SCYTHE. > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 616 bytes > Desc: Digital signature > URL: > <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150508/b7082e04/attachment-0001.sig> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:40:44 +0000 > From: remco van mook <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > To: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in > the RIPE NCC Service Region > Message-ID: > <CAJ--xAX2V3-=scMoMR+UnaxGbbYpbEz43Q3FQbCGCEMm1S=o...@mail.gmail.com > (mailto:[email protected])> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Three years and one day ago, I wrote on this very list: > > "...Personally I'm rather sick and tired of hearing people say 'yes, > let's break > IPv4 so we all MUST move to IPv6'. If you think this is good policy or even > good engineering, please think again. It will make us end up with a broken > internet that, surprise, we won't be managing any more. Breaking IPv4 might > lead to increased IPv6 adoption, but not on the internet as we know it > today. Everybody who wants to connect his organisation to the internet is > going to need at least some IPv4 address space for the time being, so why > screw it up for new entrants?..." > > Whether this is about reinventing final /8 or about people making money on > IPv4 transfers does not make one jot of a difference. > > > Remco > > (no hats) > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:54 PM Sebastian Wiesinger <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > wrote: > > > * Dan L?dtke <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> [2015-05-08 11:33]: > > > See, we can not win this games. Let?s stop wasting energy and > > > resources on dealing with legacy IP and how to make it work for a > > > bit longer. New entrants are entering are market that is not fair, > > > and we can not make a real difference. The only way forward is to > > > push IPv6 and restore a healthy climate regarding the availability > > > of IP addresses. > > > > > > > > > Dan, > > > > if you don't want to invest your time trying to make this market more > > fair by all means go ahead and do something else. There are still > > people here who would like to try so that new players can enter a > > market that will be dominated by IPv4 for some time to come. > > > > Most people here are pushing IPv6 but as much as you want to bury IPv4 > > it will still be around for some time. > > > > Regards > > > > Sebastian > > > > -- > > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > > SCYTHE. > > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150508/47c8f0cc/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:59:03 +0000 > From: "Hannigan, Martin" <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > To: remco van mook <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>, > "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])" > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in > the RIPE NCC Service Region > Message-ID: <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > +1 > > Best, > > -M< > > > > > On May 8, 2015, at 9:40 AM, remco van mook > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Three years and one day ago, I wrote on this very list: > > > "...Personally I'm rather sick and tired of hearing people say 'yes, let's > break IPv4 so we all MUST move to IPv6'. If you think this is good policy or > even good engineering, please think again. It will make us end up with a > broken internet that, surprise, we won't be managing any more. Breaking IPv4 > might lead to increased IPv6 adoption, but not on the internet as we know it > today. Everybody who wants to connect his organisation to the internet is > going to need at least some IPv4 address space for the time being, so why > screw it up for new entrants?..." > > Whether this is about reinventing final /8 or about people making money on > IPv4 transfers does not make one jot of a difference. > > > Remco > > (no hats) > > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:54 PM Sebastian Wiesinger > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > * Dan L?dtke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> [2015-05-08 11:33]: > > See, we can not win this games. Let?s stop wasting energy and > > resources on dealing with legacy IP and how to make it work for a > > bit longer. New entrants are entering are market that is not fair, > > and we can not make a real difference. The only way forward is to > > push IPv6 and restore a healthy climate regarding the availability > > of IP addresses. > > > > > Dan, > > if you don't want to invest your time trying to make this market more > fair by all means go ahead and do something else. There are still > people here who would like to try so that new players can enter a > market that will be dominated by IPv4 for some time to come. > > Most people here are pushing IPv6 but as much as you want to bury IPv4 > it will still be around for some time. > > Regards > > Sebastian > > -- > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > SCYTHE. > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150508/85740ba0/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:54:56 +0000 > From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > To: Sebastian Wiesinger <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])>, > "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])" > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in > the RIPE NCC Service Region > Message-ID: <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > If there was a magical wand that we could wave to make every ISP switch on > IPv6 the problems with IPv4 pricing etc., would vanish. > Unfortunately it doesn?t exist. > Pushing IPv6 adoption is commendable, but we have to be realistic. IPv4 won?t > vanish anytime soon. > > > -- > Mr Michele Neylon > Blacknight Solutions > Hosting, Colocation & Domains > http://www.blacknight.host/ > http://blog.blacknight.com/ > http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage > http://www.technology.ie > Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 > Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 > Social: http://mneylon.social > Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish/ > ------------------------------- > Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty > Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 > > > > > > > > > > On 08/05/2015 12:54, "Sebastian Wiesinger" <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > * Dan L?dtke <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> [2015-05-08 11:33]: > > > See, we can not win this games. Let?s stop wasting energy and > > > resources on dealing with legacy IP and how to make it work for a > > > bit longer. New entrants are entering are market that is not fair, > > > and we can not make a real difference. The only way forward is to > > > push IPv6 and restore a healthy climate regarding the availability > > > of IP addresses. > > > > > > > > > Dan, > > > > if you don't want to invest your time trying to make this market more > > fair by all means go ahead and do something else. There are still > > people here who would like to try so that new players can enter a > > market that will be dominated by IPv4 for some time to come. > > > > Most people here are pushing IPv6 but as much as you want to bury IPv4 > > it will still be around for some time. > > > > Regards > > > > Sebastian > > > > -- > > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > > SCYTHE. > > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > > > > > End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 45, Issue 8 > ************************************************ > >
