On 26/02/2019 02:30, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
> The company sending the spam said that.

I cannot read it from the text you quoted. There is no indication on
*how* the information was obtained. I am also not sure to what extent
the statement you quote is truthful. So I would not jump to conclusions.

> As said, at a minimum we should send a clear message by starting a law suit 
> against this company.
> 
> If we don't do that already, we should have a message, in the attendee list 
> of all our events (past, present and future) in the line of "This list is for 
> the benefit of the participants and RIPE doesn't authorize to use it for 
> marketing prospects or any other activities. We remind that GDPR requires 
> explicit consent to use this data".
Fine with me to do in the future. I doubt it will have any effect nor
will it strengthen any legal recourse. Retroactively adding it to all
historic meeting records is out of proportion. I do not expect spammers
to want ancient data. ;-)

Daniel

Reply via email to