> On 21 Oct 2019, at 09:20, Brian Nisbet <[email protected]> wrote: > > And, of course, as Hans Petter points out, it's already in there, v3.0 of the > CoC actually gives more clarity around the process for invoking it. The “we’ve always done that” argument is not progressive or open-minded or receptive to change. The TF need to consider other options. A range of sanctions are possible. It would be good to know what ones were discussed by the TF and why they were accepted or rejected.
- [ripe-list] Towards a more inclusive co... Job Snijders
- Re: [ripe-list] Towards a more inc... Hank Nussbacher
- Re: [ripe-list] Towards a more... Leslie
- Re: [ripe-list] Towards a ... Hank Nussbacher
- Re: [ripe-list] [comms... Amanda Gowland
- Re: [ripe-list] [... Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [ripe-list] [... Hank Nussbacher
- Re: [ripe-list] Toward... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] T... Brian Nisbet
- Re: [ripe-lis... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] Toward... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] Towards a more... Rinse Kloek via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] Towards a ... Hank Nussbacher
- Re: [ripe-list] [diversity] Toward... Sasha Romijn
