> On 21 Oct 2019, at 09:20, Brian Nisbet <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> And, of course, as Hans Petter points out, it's already in there, v3.0 of the 
> CoC actually gives more clarity around the process for invoking it.

The “we’ve always done that” argument is not progressive or open-minded or 
receptive to change. The TF need to consider other options.

A range of sanctions are possible. It would be good to know what ones were 
discussed by the TF and why they were accepted or rejected.


Reply via email to