Hi,
Please see inline.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
Hi all,
<snip>
(...)
It is even more sad that some of those provocations come from people
that are (or have been) chairs of WGs and I think they must be
exemplary. It looks like some of them believe they are kings. Maybe one
more thing to change in the PDP is a maximum number of terms to avoid
this.
I completely support this!
2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid cases
where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
I think also sanctions of the AUP should be stricter in those cases and
this shows that also we are missing in the PDP a procedure for
recalling chairs. For those that aren?t aware, this just happened in
AFRINIC (a Recall Committee has decided that both cochairs are recalled
with immediate effect, in short because they violated the PDP and took
decisions or attributions beyond what is set in the PDP).
I think the general idea is not to have frequent "impeachments", but
establish a process where a WG chair change (against his/her own
will, when they violate the PDP) isn't halted at some point by one of its
friends.
Regards,
Carlos
