On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 05.00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list, < [email protected]> wrote:
> > It could also be the other way round. People might be discouraged to > run > against the long-time chairs. > > > **** Exactly, that's was my point, it looks that I was not able to find > the best wording. I've seen that in other organizations, not just here. > > 1) You ask for volunteers to replace "existing co-chair a" > 2) There are 1-2 volunteers > 3) "existing co-chair a" say, I will also volunteer to continue > 4) There are comments like "existing co-chair a" has been there for long > time, he knows the job ... > 5) the 1-2 volunteers then drop-out. > Some believe elections for chair means to reelect if the former chair did OK. I believe Jordi's observation above is correct. It makes the community seem smaller, rather than invite in new people. I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the seat really was vacant. -- robert >
