Dear colleagues,

Apologies for the delayed response concerning the RIPE NCC's KYC processes
referenced in the mail thread around a beIN article and references to
Notorious Markets here
<https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/AR54WJAJNMLO5WM26H62TKZTODRSQOC2/>
– RIPE 91 preparations have been keeping us busy!

In answer to Michele: our first impression is largely in line with what
Nick and others have already said in the thread – the report seems to mix
up the RIPE NCC’s due diligence processes and responsibilities with
entities that are either involved on the user or content layer of the
Internet (e.g. ISPs)[1] or are sponsoring End Users, in which case the RIPE
NCC only has a contractual agreement with the sponsoring organization.

It’s understandable that people use ‘KYC’ as shorthand for making sure bad
actors can’t hide. However, the Internet registry system is substantively
different from (e.g.) the financial services industry where this term
originates. The RIPE Database does not hold information about individual
users or website content. It holds information about who is responsible for
IP addresses and AS Numbers, and parts of this information is curated by
the holders of these resources themselves. Our job is to ensure that the
RIPE NCC-curated part of this data is correct and that the right people can
be contacted if needed (e.g. abuse-c contacts).

Of course, this is a complex issue and we invite all stakeholders with
concerns to raise them within the RIPE community, both on the appropriate
WG mailing lists and at the RIPE Meeting next week.

For our part, I will see to it that we prepare some material that clearly
outlines what we currently do in terms of due diligence checks and where
responsibility for maintaining data rests under the existing framework.
This can form the basis for any constructive discussions stakeholders wish
to have on this topic moving forward. We will therefore aim to publish
something on RIPE Labs after RIPE 91, which can be informed by any
discussions we have at the meeting.

Radu, I've also asked someone from my team to contact you as I would like
to understand what went wrong with your referenced tickets.
-- 

Gabor de Wit

Chief Registry Officer | RIPE NCC

----------------------------------------------

[1] For more information on the differences between the various
responsibilities in Internet governance, have a look at an excellent RIPE
Labs article here:

https://labs.ripe.net/author/anastasiya-pak/hisham-ibrahim-the-internet-is-not-what-you-think-it-is/
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/ripe-list.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to