On 25. 11. 25 18:44, Gert Doering wrote: > The idea about "tagging as anycast" is not to make other networks > prioritize these (and prioritize in which way, anyhow?) but to give > them the chance to do informed decisions on hot/cold-potato routing, > which might look different for anycast and for non-anycast prefixes - or, > when faced with "what looks like funny routing", to do better informing > debugging.
Hi, What would be your preference about how your upstreams handles your packets? Hot or cold potatoe routing? Cheers, Jan ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/ripe-list.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
