rudholm Wrote: 
> I agree that the slimserver interface is really not nearly as good as
> the Squeezebox.
> 
> I'm having the same problem with thumbnails.  Of about 1500 albums, I
> have about 760 images as .folder.png and folder.jpg.  Only about 63
> show up as thumbnails when I go to "Browse Artwork".  I'm running the
> 2/10/06 build of 6.2.x on a 2.4 Linux kernel (that is no where near
> running out of RAM).
> 
> Images do show up under individual albums.

Can't vouch for png files, but slimserver works fine for cover.jpg
images located in individual album folders.  Have made standard 250
pixel by 250 pixel files by scanning cd covers at 53 pixels per inch. 
If you scan at a higher resolution and then resize down, the artwork
does not look nearly as good. 

Alternate source if you don't like scanning is to go to Amazon com and
search music for the album or artist.  If you right click on the image
and look at properties you can find the pixel size.  Then right click
again and use "save this image as" to store it as "cover.jpg" in the
appropriate album file.

If you use 250 pixels as the standard image width and height, Slim
server apparently stretches a smaller or disproportioned image to be
250 by 250 more or less.  Even more, the images are apparently scanned
as part of the music update.  Thus if you change or add a cover.jpg,
the revised or added image will NOT, repeat NOT, show up until the
music is rescanned.

Next to Amazon the next best source is a google search for the album or
artist in "images" but most of what will showup will be either too small
or need resizing.

Good luck.


-- 
dickmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
dickmc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4025
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20427

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to