Josh Coalson;161976 Wrote: > flake is neat but I would not recommend using it yet: > > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=45013&st=300&p=443961&#entry443961 > > you can get some of improved compression with flac itself, with some > clever use of command-line options. > > Josh
Ouch! jcoalson Wrote: > I built r108 and ran part of the FLAC test suite against it (stereo > 16bps streams), and some files silently failed to generate correct FLAC > files, i.e. encoding them appeared to work but the decoded file did not > match the input. Not lossless! Glad I didn't encode anything with it. I haven't encoded much with FLAC 1.1.3 yet actually, and I understand it compresses a little higher. Thanks Josh. -- Mark Lanctot ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30178 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
