Phil Meyer;165067 Wrote: > I believe FLAC compresses to a smaller size than wma lossless (probably > not a lot in it though). That should translate to a bigger buffer in > the Squeezebox. > > FLAC is a fast decompressor - it should be less CPU intensive for > playback. > > I believe more people around here are using FLAC, and the Squeezebox > has supported it natively a lot longer than WMA, so there's more chance > of stability and support. > > Phil
Thanks, that's the type of info I was looking for. I appreciate Pat's reply too. -- mswlogo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30978 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
