Gazza_UK;269473 Wrote: > So if it actually fails on something, then it will report errors back at > the end? I am just assuming if it says 'no errors' then all my tracks > are fine.
Yes, that's the case. It re-reads sectors until it reads it identically - I thought twice, but maybe it's more. Once it's satisfied it has the sector right, it moves on and does not report an error, but it does lower the track quality rating. If it uses up all the retries with no agreement, it reports an error, writes the first (?) value it got and moves on. If it does that enough, (at least two sectors in a row) you will hear an audible defect and it will always be reported in the log as "Suspicious position MM:SS.SS". What I do is play the file back over headphones, concentrating right around those positions. Generally one sector in error is not enough to cause something noticeable, it requires several in a row. -- Mark Lanctot Ben Klass: "I won't even eat a pre-7.0 meal. Well, unless it involves bacon." SB2, Transporter, beta SBR, beta SBC, production SBC ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43348 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
