Personally, I have never had to set a comp=0 tag, ever, for anything.
I have never had server call something with no comp tags AND album artist tags a comp. if it ever has done so, I would love to know the criteria necessary to cause it? My understanding is this: There are only 2 circumstances u would need a comp=0 tag: 1. Server is identifying something as a comp, for whatever reason, and the user wants to force server to NOT recognize whatever it is as a comp. (Again, not something I ever have an issue with, since I put album artist tags on everything) 2. A user has a CD ripped such that different tracks are in different folders, (like iTunes did, and maybe still does), and by setting comp=0 the CD shows as one album, but not a comp. imagine a CD like Duets. The differing folders would have made server think it's differing albums when it isn't, (I think, or maybe the different artists in different folders, etc) but it's also not a comp. so the comp=0 tag "fixes" the issue. (Again, not something I ever have an issue with, since I always rip one CD to one folder. Imo, server shouldn't accommodate bad behavior by crap like iTunes, but there it is) So bottom line is most people shouldn't need or use comp=0 tags. Even if they have some justification by the 2 usage cases above, server is buggy enough to where u still can get weird results. The two links in my sig and bugzilla have documentation of such bizarre behaviors. using: win7 64 + lms 7.9 & duet & ipads w/the logitech app, and ipeng on an ipod http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/various_artists_logic & http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/compilations ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BJW's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58242 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110204 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
