emalvick wrote: > A benefit to going with FLAC (or perhaps ALAC if one was inclined) is > that the tags and files are likely to be more widely supported. > > I've not used WAV files directly, but for a while (before FLAC really > took off), I was using APE and SHN files. I probably would have stuck > with them, but support was inconsistent and now FLAC is the standard for > lossless. Thankfully, it is easy to change lossless files to other > lossless types. Totally worth it as I quickly learned that FLAC files > are so nice and flexible with regard to metadata.
I just figured that since the OP has been around these forums since 2006 they are probably aware of FLAC and have chosen WAV for their own reasons. Because of that I figured I'd just answer the question rather than giving reasons why they should convert their library. Main system - Rock Solid with LMS 7.9.1 Official on WHS 2011 - 2 Duets and Squeeseslave Cabin system - Rock solid with LMS 7.9.1 Official on Win10 Pro - 1 RPi 3 Model B/Hifiberry DAC+ Pro/PiCorePlayer and Squeezeslave ------------------------------------------------------------------------ w3wilkes's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22973 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110379 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
