mrw wrote: > Quite possibly it is their "invention". :) > > I suppose that if this '@con' atom has now become the norm for modern > taggers, then there's good reason for LMS to follow suit. From memory, > LMS would see it as 'CON', because I think that's what Audio::Scan does > with these '@...' atoms.
Yes, it e.g. sees the "©wrt" as "WRT", and as WRT is included in the Tag Mapping list, it is recognized correctly as the "COMPOSER" tag. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ schup011's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66557 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111751
_______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
