navlefnuller wrote: > > So, what to think? Uncle Google to the rescue, and lo and behold, > apparently I am not alone, in thinking that flacs are not just flacs, > and certainly not as "lossless" as you might think, as this > scientifically more substantiated 'article' > (http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/viewpoint/0716/Why_Do_WAV_And_FLAC_Files_Sound_Different.htm) > seems to conclude. >
Forgive my skepticism, but an article that uses the perceived height of an instrument as a proxy for sound quality, and never does a bitwise comparison* of the WAV files that they claim get successively worse, is not what I'd call 'scientifically substantiated'. Seems like a perfect opportunity for 'imagination' to create an effect. * Maybe they did, but I gave up reading. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114457 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list ripping@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
