On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Fred Gleason wrote:

> On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:54 22, Rob Landry wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, it's the transition from one state to 
>> another that Rivendell sees, and not merely the state of the GPI being 
>> grounded or not.

> Correct.  In fact, it's possible to configure things so that completely 
> different actions happen when a line goes low->high and high->low.

>> It may be that if the transition happens too slowly, Rivendell won't 
>> see it. That could be ugly.

> This will be totally a function of the particular hardware in use.  If 
> the hardware tells the software that a transition happened, then it's 
> acted upon.  If not, then not.  No 'in-betweens' here.

I'm worried about things like contact bounce. The beauty of systems that 
act on states rather than transitions -- if it's low, go  -- is that they 
tend to be more forgiving of hardware peculiarities. I've run across 
transition-sensitive boxes that wouldn't fire on anything but a hard relay 
closure, and sometimes fired more than one event at a time due to contact 
bounce.

Today I assembled an exact duplicate of my client's system in my living 
room, complete with Broadcast Tools ACS8.2 switcher. I'm going to 
experiment with it tomorrow to see what, if anything, I need to build in 
the way of an eternal interface.

I do wish there were a way of "turning off" inputs during times when the 
desired satellite feed isn't on. I need to make sure that closures 
received during other programs don't cause events in my log to be 
truncated or skipped.


Rob
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to