On Friday 13 January 2012 01:34:08 pm James Harrison wrote: > Are there > any workflows which would be broken by making this the default > behaviour,
OK, I want to do this, and then that, then the other thing. Oh, wait, I didn't really want to do that, so I reload without save, getting back to where I started. That's what you've broken. > or do I need to look at making this a configurable option? I ( as long time readers know ) *always* vote for configurable, preferably by admin. > I > can't immediately think of any issues this could cause and suspect that > this would actually be a nice change for everyone in terms of ease of > use in any case. This is usually the kind of thing that causes unintended consequences to become manifest with catastrophic results, for someone. Such is *why* I always vote configurable. Frankly, it seems a better behaviour would be to check before saving that what was loaded still matches what would be loaded now. If different, someone else changed something that may conflict. Toss up a warning. If no changes have appeared, then lock, save, unlock. -- Cowboy http://cowboy.cwf1.com Justice is incidental to law and order. -- J. Edgar Hoover _______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
