----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred Gleason" <fr...@paravelsystems.com>

> On 7/24/14, 11:02 53, Cowboy wrote:
> >   There are people ( me ) who diligently avoid upgrading anything
> >   absent a*good* reason to do so.
> >   "Latest and greatest" is probably the absolute worst reason
> >   anyone could have.
> 
> Provided that you are operating Rivendell in a secure setting (protected
> LAN, trusted operators), there is a lot to be said for this approach.
> However, RD 1.x has some significant security holes (wide open
> permissions on the audio store being a big one) that have been
> addressed in 2.x, so if security is a concern, a move to 2.x is likely
> indicated.

By all means.  Of course, Cowboy's assertion and mine are different.  :-)

PS: Who the hell runs broadcast automation *not* on a separate protected
network (preferably an air-gapped one)?  (Yes, yes, I know: there are lots
of foolish people in the world...)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       j...@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to