On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:22:01 -0500 Tim Camp <[email protected]> wrote:
> So are you saying it's best to use ext3? Not necessarily. EXT4 has some features you may want. You didn't say, but if you are using ext4 AND you fill the disk, then this is a reasonable candidate for the problem you mentioned. Personally, I do tend to stay with mature code, provided it satisfies the requirements I have for it. ( I do like EXT3, especially data-journaled. Slower, but higher reliability in the face of unreliable power and such. ) -- Cowboy Said the attractive, cigar-smoking housewife to her girl-friend: "I got started one night when George came home and found one burning in the ashtray." _______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list [email protected] http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
