On Oct 16, 2018, at 14:37, Cowboy <[email protected]> wrote:
> And, I can find no benefit ( for my purposes ) of EXT4 over EXT3.
The primary user-facing difference is greater capacity. You can find a good
overview of the differences (including the data-commit issue to which Cowboy
alludes) at:
http://www.pointsoftware.ch/en/4-ext4-vs-ext3-filesystem-and-why-delayed-allocation-is-bad/
<http://www.pointsoftware.ch/en/4-ext4-vs-ext3-filesystem-and-why-delayed-allocation-is-bad/>
FWIW, I generally use XFS for all of my Rivendell builds. That filesystem was
originally developed by Silicon Graphics specifically for use in large
multimedia storage environments, so it’s a good fit there.
Cheers!
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer |
| | Paravel Systems |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| A room without books is like a body without a soul. |
| -- Cicero |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
