Gregg Wonderly wrote: > Mark Brouwer wrote: >> 3) JTSK code version 2.1.1 [1], all parts which Sun can transfer to the >> ASF, even the code we will likely remove [2] according to the roadmap >> >> 4) Outstanding issues against JTSK version 2.1.1 > > I would prefer that there be a base revision eqivalent to the last > public release of the JTSK from the old jini.org drop. Any additional > changes on top of that should be checked in as revisions to that > baseline so that everyone with changes to the base can easily extract > and generate diffs to work on arriving at a common codeline that will > benefit all of us who have been making bug fixes and other related > changes that we will need to be able to generate tangible diffs for > consideration by the committers. >
Yer, so I'm not sure but I think Mark might be talking about outstanding RFE's, Bug Reports etc rather than patches etc. However, if I'm wrong and he is talking about patches, I'm with you. Dan.
