Mark Brouwer wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> I think that it's something that doesn't need to be decided up front - >> it's something that can evolve as the community does. > > While I understand it is quite easy to move things around in the > repository, it is always troubles for those working on the project. So a > little bit of thinking up front won't do any harm. >
Agreed but do you not feel like we're still guessing for the most part? Especially as we haven't got much in the way of feedback from the community to give us a hint as to how they might want things done? > At least I can identify ServiceUI and the JTSK as completely independent > and maybe also the QA test framework. We have to make a decision either > way so I'm in favor of: > Given that these are well isolated packages anyways, I'm not as yet sure why giving them all a separate trunk helps us much at this stage. I'd want to figure out what the interface dependencies etc are between these things first at least. > /river/jtsk/trunk > /river/qatest/trunk [a bit less sure about this one] > /river/serviceui/trunk > /river/site/ Let's see what others think.......I'm just aware that we've not seen much from anyone else (particularly committers) as yet on this or many of the other topics we've started in on. Dan.
