On 1/4/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/4/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Yep >> >> On Jan 4, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: >> >> > You might consider a JIRA component called "web site and >> > infrastructure" that covers several categories of non-code issues. >> > > > > I have prepared a patch to the web site doing mostly s/STATUS/JIRA, > but also > expressing what seems to be the consensus view that all significant > code or > doco changes should be tracked via JIRA tickets. I'd hardly call it a consensus view.
Ack. Just wanted to get something out there for people to react to. The wording may be stronger than some would like, which is fine - we can adjust, the the patch gives us something concrete to work from.
That ticket should > logically be opened under a component such as Craig describes > above. Any > objections to my creating a JIRA component called "web site and > infrastructure"? None whatsoever.
Done. In harmony, we have one called "contibutions" that make it easy to
see what external "bulk" contirbutions have been offered... If people like that, maybe you should make that too...
Also done. We can edit / remove if there are objections or better ideas on where to put this stuff. Phil
