Gregg Wonderly wrote:
I think that the behavior of fallback URLs is useful. Given the
framework that
exists, I think that the current implementation is applicable. But, I also
I've a bit of a problem positioning your language Gregg due to the words
fallback and framework, but are you suggesting the new behavior should
be conditionally. Note that as far as I can tell the only
de-optimization is the one Peter will be remembered for the rest of his
life.
think that making this a more described behavior in a new platform
RMIClassLoaderSPI implementation with different annotations would also be
something to investigate. That SPI would perhaps be incompatible with
existing
MarshalledObject annotation formats, so it would be equivalent to using
a custom
URL protocol handler from the perspective that you'd have to have
support for it
everywhere that your codebase URLs went.
One thing at a time Gregg ;-) but if I interpreted the above correct I
think this change has no impact on whatever protocol handler will be
used in the future as it is really tied to the "jar:" protocol handler.
--
Mark
