Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 5/19/07, Shane Curcuru (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for following up on logo guidelines!
[...]
- Shane, via prc@
To anyone wondering, I asked the Public Relations Committee
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for feedback on the proposed logo. The response was
positive, so we're good to go if we want to start using the logo.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
I don't want to demean any work that anyone has accomplished, and I
guess that a LOGO is great (no turtle!), but how about laying out a
timeline or a prioritized list of requirements? Few people care if it
looks more like a brook than a stream.
Hi Cristopher,
I'm not completely sure how to interpret your posting. Is it that you
want to have requirements with regard to a logo (a competition), or did
you hijack ;-) this posting to tell us there are more important things
to worry about and that you want to see a road map.
Nevertheless, now that we are so close to have something most people
gave a +1 for even without the formal vote and nobody that (dared) to be
negative I think bringing one issue to a (quick) end is a big step for
this project that is getting out of its hibernating state.
If you want to see a road map I won't disagree but anybody is free to
put up issues for discussion. I think a few subjects will be touched
when the source is in SVN just because they can't be ignored then and
from that the road map will evolve, but this is not a requirement. So as
said before feel free to start any discussion if you want to see some
particular things to happen.
--
Mark
