On May 30, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Jim Hurley wrote:
In order to proceed getting the source in - I'd like to hold off on
spinning another bundle and would rather wait on making any
change to the footer on the bottom of the Javadoc until we get the
contribution formally accepted and into svn.
It would be good to get agreement on what the right change is, so
we can do it once we're making changes in Apache River.
Hope that sounds okay to everyone.
Yep, it was not my intentions to have Frank continue playing with JIRA
attachments.
We can fix the issue for Windows once the code is in SVN and at the
same time fix the language if we want.
I agree as well.
While we're on the subject, I have a question regarding the SVN
repository
structure. Once we're ready to upload to SVN, we're going to need a
plan
for the repository layout or does such a plan already exist? If not,
I'd
imagine the JTSK repository would basically look like the following:
trunk/jtsk/
LICENSE
NOTICE
build.xml
build_common.xml
doc/
src/
Or should we be more consistent with the current serviceui repository?
trunk/serviceui/
LICENSE
NOTICE
doc/
com/
net/
If it's decided the the jtsk repository is to be consistent with the
serviceui
repository (ie, move jtsk/src/* up one level), the ant scripts will
be initially
broken but could be fixed in short order as one of the initial
development tasks.
Alternatively, the serviceui repository could be changed to be
consistent with
the jtsk repository... At first glance, this approach seems like it
would be
more straight forward.
Comments?
Frank
