On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Dan Creswell wrote:
John McClain - Sun Microsystems, Inc. wrote:Mark Brouwer wrote:Finally, around version -- some have expressed a desire to followthe version numbering of the starter kit (to align with those releases and communicate that this isn't a 0.1 release or the like). Thus, the last Starter Kit release was "v2.1" so this could be (v.2.1.1, v2.2, or v.3.0). I don't really have a personal preference on this one at all,and am very interested in what your opinion is here.v2.1.1[snip]I assume at some point before we exit incubation the need to move fromthe com.sun.jini package name space will make us want to bump the version number to at least 2.2, if not 3.0.So this really matters at the point where we remove the com.sun.jini packages entirely (we were talking about a "temporary" compatibility type thing as a possibility). Regardless when the removal happens if we haven't bumped the releasenumber substantially by then I too would have thought we should bump itat that point.
To avoid confusion, I'd recommend that when you change package names, you make a Major Release.
3.0 sounds like a good number. Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
