Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[x] +1 I agree with this branching strategy
Anything else before we can see development commits going into the tree?
I'm not sure, once we have a branching strategy I think we should decide
how qatest and jtsk relate to each other (release cycle wise), currently
we have:
/river/trunk/jtsk
/river/trunk/qatest
which might need to be transformed into:
/river/jtsk/trunk
/river/qatest/trunk
If the 2 go hand in hand it might also be an option to integrate them,
but I think there are some people that have a better understanding of
their relation to provide some insight.
--
Mark
