Thomas Vinod Johnson wrote:
Mark Brouwer wrote:
Hi Vinod,
Patch looks good however I wonder why you decided to start with a
delay of 20 seconds (due to the index of 2) versus removing the first
2 entries in the sleepTime array? Not
Thanks.
that it really matters much ...
Not sure I follow. The sleepTime array's values (including the first
two) could continue still be used for the back off in the case that
initial discovery fails. As for using 20 seconds, that was somewhat
arbitrary.
I overlooked the initial discovery case, sorry.
--
Mark
