On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Dan Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed you created a branch (which I'm guessing is for POC of this sort > of work). Could you send out an email when you have such a branch ready > enough for others to tinker with? Well, in fact I want to tinker myself... And have done so on my locally checked-out copy, and without regards to compatibility, completeness and test compliance (yet). 1. Yes, I also prefer Maven, especially since it allows for better modularization, such as enforcement of no-cyclic deps. 2. Structure101 reports a couple of architectural 'badness', which are quite easily fixed by moving a few things around. 3. I like modularization. Jini is quite good, and hat of to the Sun team who manage to keep the architectural structure as nice as it is even though it sits in s single codebase tree. I have started to break things out into separate modules. Still more to do. 4. I have not tackled the -dl.jar issue yet. IMHO, I would have them as separate Maven modules, as then the dependency for clients become crystal clear. I *could* commit what I have, although it is not complete in many ways, will get a lot of flack for some incompatibilities, and so on... I don't expect the branch to survive, and should probably been given a name to illustrate that. Cheers Niclas
