On Dec 20, 2008, at 3:09 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
Am I clear?
But you were! saying that Jini should be depending on JavaSpaces and
not the other way around as is now the case. Why? Jini is about
Service Discovery, and why would a Space implementation be a backbone
of that?
My argument is that River should have a JavaSpaces implementation
that
does not require a network setup, as a stepping stone to lower the
threshold of River adoption. (The "First Shot is Free" comes to
mind.)
Agreed and I actally think that's what Michael wants but he's
expressing
it very poorly dressed up in architectural arguments about cohesion
etc.
Dan, this is not what I want. I do think it is important, but all my
work is in network systems and, like JINI, dedicated to making the 8
Fallacies of Network Computing transparent.
Mike
Michael McGrady
Senior Engineer
Topia Technology, Inc.
1.253.720.3365
mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com
