There needs to be a lot more said than this and no I could not say I
would be happy but this certainly captures the spirit of what I
believe would be desirable. I making jINI one among many here as it
were does a lot to solve some significant issues. There still are
troubles with this but I think this is not the same and would
definitely help.
Mike
On Dec 20, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Michael McGrady
<mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com> wrote:
My position is that JavaSpaces has value aside from the objectives
of JINI
and should be able to stand alone and to be consistent with JINI
competitors
just like RMI is (without discussing the JERI issues). To do that,
JavaSpaces cannot depend on JINI interfaces, even if present JINI
interfaces
include things that JavaSpaces must depend upon. That is
fundamentally
where I stand.
So, if I claim that we have subprojects;
Apache River Lease
Apache River Transaction
Apache River Entry
Apache River JavaSpaces
Apache River Jini Service Platform
Would you then be happy?
(Because that is what we in reality have.)
Cheers
Niclas
Michael McGrady
Senior Engineer
Topia Technology, Inc.
1.253.720.3365
mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com
