Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote:
JBoss Retro, aparently supports the full Java 5 API, it's licensed LGPL, but
that shouldn't be a problem since we only need the binary.
To clarify a bit; If JBoss Retro is "used" to produce River, similar
to a 'compiler' it ends up being a System Requirement for building the
released sources. That is Ok. But it is not Ok to include the JBoss
Retro in the released artifacts of River, not even binary ones.
Hope that is clearer.
Cheers
Thanks, that it clears it up.
I've got a preference for Retrotranslator based on technical merit, see
my other post.
Cheers.
