Guys, I'm going to try to throw another wrench in the works! :-) The confluence of OSGi and Jini certainly seemed to generate "feedback", and now we clearly seem to be struggling with issues related to semantics!
For those who know me at all are probably not surprised that I would introduce ontology to the dialog. So, without further delay... I recommend we consider the Open Group's "Ontologies for SOA<https://www.opengroup.org/projects/soa-ontology/>" onto the mix. Draft ontology artifacts are already crafted; so perhaps we can reference their work to promote a common understanding. Happy Thanksgiving! Sam On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Michael McGrady < [email protected]> wrote: > I suggest that the "Service Pattern" Peter has suggested be referred to as > the "Service Model" instead. > -- Sam Chance 443-694-5293 (m) 410-694-0240 x108 (o)
