Interesting. Not sure whether the harness is actually running in distributed mode though.
2010/11/1 Sim IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> > On 11/01/2010 06:22 PM, Jonathan Costers wrote: > >> Not sure if I understand correctly ... Is this a mechanism that we have in >> place already? >> > > In the SlaveHarness a KeepAlive thread is started. This 'keepalive' > connects to the MasterHarness.KEEPALIVE_PORT and if this port disappears, it > does a TeardownRequest before a System.exit(1). > > My proposal would be, no TeardownRequest, and a Runtime.halt(1) instead of > the exit. > > Gr. Sim >
