Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 02-11-10 12:22, Tom Hobbs wrote:
I'd like to give people a chance to pass their eye over it first. It
is just a reference implementation/example of how to do a certain
thing. I doubt that the code is bullet proof.
If there is something wrong with it, people can file a jira for it.
The selfhealingproxy is in the extra section, and there are not a lot of
river parts depending on it, so my stake would be: commit it.
I'd like a short delay before the next significant surgery on the trunk.
Yesterday, I checked in a qa/build.xml change that should increase by
several hundred the number of tests in a full QA run. I've also checked
in bug fixes that make those tests pass, at least on my computer. Can we
hold off until there has been a clean Hudson run with the added tests?
Patricia
