On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:40:19 +0100 Jonathan Costers <jonathan.cost...@googlemail.com> wrote:
... > Not all of them use/need a multi VM setup. Those are candidates for > JUnit. The others would be QA candidates. > I'm not saying it is easy to migrate any of these though, doing so > requires knowledge of how the jtreg framework operates, as well as > the proposed target framework (JUnit, QA). > > > > > > JUnit's good when we're only testing a single object > > implementation, we can document and expect people to utilse the qa > > suite for more complex tests. > > Agreed. Hello hard workers, It would be worth considering the use of TestNG instead of JUnit. I have no experience in their comparison, so relied on other sources when I was to decid what framework to use (like this: http://www.mkyong.com/unittest/junit-4-vs-testng-comparison/). TestNG features that are missing from JUnit can be useful in a complex test environment like that of River. Zsolt
