Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 11/07/2010 10:10 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
The reason to avoid V1, is mostly due to it's unicast implementation, it
has no privacy integrity or authentication ability and uses
MarshalledObject's serialized form, over which we have no control.
I was talking non-sense. V1 has an array as well. I'm talking about
the "Protocol Version 1 Announcement Packet Format", if we insert DNS
data in the same place as this packet, would the discovery stay V1, or
will it upgrade to V2?
Gr. Sim
The discovery protocol is relevant to unicast, so perhaps we should
specify it too.
TXT keys:
txtvers=<8 bit byte version number of the DNS-SD TXT record format>
dpv=<8bit byte discovery protocol version number>
sid=<128bit hash code service ID>
grp=<comma separated list of group names to which the service belongs>
Cheers,
Peter.
