On 26-11-10 14:42, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
2. Ensuring that the River features that are used during the current
teardown are tested in some other way.
But only if the teardown is already part of the testresult. Is it?
Whether or not a teardown failure gets reflected in the test result, we
would learn about it soon enough under current conditions, due e.g. to
non-running of subsequent tests. I suspect we do have the formal test
coverage, but I'll take a look at what teardown uses now, and check.
What worries me a little is the state the operating system keeps on
terminated processes. We know of the SO_REUSEADDR issue, but you seem to
experience the non-release of resources on process termination. formally
a OS bug, but if so is something we need to workaround. How definate are
you on your reports where you have problems rerunning a test caused by
the OS not releasing resources on VM exit?
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
