In relation to "which JVMs are interesting", the article at
<http://terrencebarr.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/java-se-for-embedded-devices-new-release-new-features-better-performance/#comment-661>
has some information about more stuff brewing. This type of environment could
be a primary target for Jini enabled applications, and a ServiceUI based
delivery mechanism.
Gregg Wonderly
On 12/2/2010 12:42 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 127PM, MICHAEL MCGRADY wrote:
Perhaps this will help: on the generic question of going to Java 1.6, and my
plea not to do it.
http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/33475
Michael,
Thanks for the link. You may also find more information here:
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp
One thing on this topic that I am curious about is what Oracle's plan is for
RTJ. We certainly cant answer that in this forum. But... will they keep it? If
so, and if they are given a large enough business opportunity for it's use,
will they move towards supporting 1.6? While this is a very interesting and
compelling technical use of River, is it enough to prohibit River moving to 1.6
and beyond?
Just asking ...
Regards
Dennis
