Peter Firmstone wrote:
Dennis Reedy wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 127PM, MICHAEL MCGRADY wrote:
Perhaps this will help: on the generic question of going to Java
1.6, and my plea not to do it.
http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/33475
Michael,
Thanks for the link. You may also find more information here:
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp
One thing on this topic that I am curious about is what Oracle's plan
is for RTJ. We certainly cant answer that in this forum. But... will
they keep it? If so, and if they are given a large enough business
opportunity for it's use, will they move towards supporting 1.6?
While this is a very interesting and compelling technical use of
River, is it enough to prohibit River moving to 1.6 and beyond?
Just asking ...
Regards
Dennis
I Spoke to Greg Bollella over the phone about this some time ago,
Oracle was quite keen on it, capable of generating lots of data see
and well, Oracle have this database...
Although I haven't heard anything, this problem might solve itself,
given 6 months, perhaps there might be a 1.6 release of RTSJ, seeing as
JSE 1.6 Embedded has also been released.
Cheers,
Peter.
