Update: I've done the parent docs directory. I'm starting in the specs directory now, if someone wants to take the release-notes one.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Tom Hobbs <tvho...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It is big. Also very boring. > > A link check when I'm done would be great, as I know already that some > of the links are broken. > > I'm dropping some content as I go along because we have better docs > elsewhere (e.g. the build instructions) but other things, like the > activation.html and I'm sure others, I will make sure get linked to > from somewhere. > > If anyone one wants to help I've started in the parent docs directory. > There are the release-notes and specs directories that also need > doing... > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG <s...@qcg.nl> wrote: >> On 08-12-10 13:26, Tom Hobbs wrote: >>> >>> This is not fun work and i've not sorted the formatting out yet. Also >>> I image that many of the links are broken. >>> >>> We certainly need to fix the "original Jini wiki" links, and probably >>> put a link to the specs on the front page. I think it's more >>> intuitive to have them there than on the "Documentation" sub-page, I >>> can't explain my reasoning other than gut feel. >>> >>> I'd like to leave the link broken for now until I've got the specs in >>> better order. I think that it's going to take a while... >> >> It curtainly looks like an huge job. We have to do the release notes for >> every release. How do we do this in the future? We should give the release >> notes their own directory, so we can keep a online archive of them for later >> use. We could also give them their own style and sidebar. >> >> Do you want a linklint (link check) once in a while? >> >> Gr. Sim >> >> -- >> QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl >> Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397 >> >
