Yes, that would be the idea. -jeff
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just so I understand ... > > So are you thinking that the embeddable space has JavaSpace(05)-like > invocations and matching, but does not require remote semantics? Would you > use this as a 'local' service, not visible to anything outside of the JVM? > > > >
