On 12/19/2010 03:41 AM, Wade Chandler wrote:
Just to verify, we are talking about generics for a situation like this are
we?
public<T extends Entry> T get( T entry )
{
return (T) new Entry();
}
Yes, the other issue Peter is talking about can occur now as we are talking
about someones Entry implementation where they may use generics in one of their
fields.
Ok, but the construct of the above has not been discussed until
conclusion. Shall we consolidate this first, and then move on to other
issues?
Gr. Sim