Isn't that already jsk-platform.jar? I would object to anything that subverts the dynamic proxy loading concept that is central to Jini.
It is imperative that people don't, for instance, get the service-registrar proxy impls in their local class path. That would break compatibility with future or alternate impls. Cheers, Greg ------Original Message------ From: Sim IJskes - QCG To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org ReplyTo: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: river.jar Sent: Dec 31, 2010 10:07 AM Hello, anybody have an objection against a river.jar in the build that contains all river runtime classes? Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397 Sent from my “contract free” BlackBerry® smartphone on the WIND network.
